Writinghood > Style > How To

Writing Crap: Giving Writers Elbow Room

Advice for would-be writers: write "crap". Write nonsense/rubbish/whatever comes into your head. That's a starting point.

For many years now I have encouraged my students - whether they be Primary or Secondary school kids in a writing workshop, or adults serious enough about the writer's trade to have enrolled in a Professional Writing course - to write "crap".

“Don't try to write well,” I insist. “Just write the first thing that comes into your head.”

I claim no originality for this. It's a technique popularized by the English educator Peter Elbow in the writing strategy he termed “Free writing”.

It's a piece of advice that stems directly from the ground breaking work of Henrietta Klauser, in her book "Writing from Both Sides of the Brain".

In the fifties and sixties, the orthodoxy in the teaching of writing focussed on the need for careful pre-planning, and for a self-consciously censorial/ editorial approach to the writing process: “Plan what you are going to write carefully before you put pen to paper. Don't write until you've formulated your ideas precisely in your head.”

The “policeman”/editor at the gates of consciousness - the critical, judgmental, organised and logical Left brain - is only too ready to fulfill this role. As a consequence, a large proportion of children taught by this approach were paralysed by the thought of having to commit their ideas to paper. Nothing they thought of, it seemed to them, was going to be good enough.

What Klauser argued, persuasively, was that writing needs to harness both sides of the brain - the unpredictable, visual, creative, unfettered Right brain, and the ordered, critical left brain. Utilise each part of the brain in turn; let the ideas flow freely, argued Klauser. Put the policeman to sleep; send the critic away for a time, and let Ariel - the free spirit of creativity - loose.

The source of Elbow's "Free writing" is clear, and it has become part of teaching orthodoxy in primary and secondary schools, and in tertiary writing courses. Pour the words out onto the page; don't worry about "surface" features like spelling and punctuation; just get your ideas down; there time later to refine and redraft and focus on getting everything right.

This key idea underlies Julia Cameron's "Morning pages" - which she discusses in the influential “The Artist's Way.' Like Elbow's free writing, Cameron's Morning Pages are a way of getting into the flow of writing - tapping the ideas and experiences and "material" that the writer unconsciously wants to access. Faced with the blank page each morning, you simply write - starting with where you are at that moment - geographically, physically, emotionally, intellectually, spiritually …

The faith is that through writing you will find what you want to say.

So, in workshops and in classes, I encourage young and not-so-young writers to “let the words flow… write whatever comes into your head … write crap.” I have faith that they, like other writers - including myself - will write their way into insight; that through puddling around, putting ideas down, they will in time begin to discover some gold in the mullock, or that they will find seeds - anecdotes, phrases, whole paragraphs even - that they will be able to develop and refine later into stories or poems or articles.

Recently, though, I've begun to toy with what may be an extension of that idea. The free writing approach assumes that much that emerges from "the top of the head" will be fairly ordinary stuff; that it may well be vaguely and poorly expressed. "Crap" in this setting is an unintended outcome, a result - unavoidably - of the admonition to write quickly and freely and without editorial constaints.

As I've suggested , though, I've recently tried a variation on this theme. I've asked students to deliberately write badly; to consciously produce work that is cliché ridden, badly formulated, disorganized, poorly expressed; to produce pieces of work that break all the rules. In this approach, the "crap" is produced very deliberately.

It is a little like the now annual Bulwer/Lytton Bad Writing contest. Edward George Bulwer-Lytton was a nineteenth century novelist who produced paragraphs like the following, the opening paragraph of his 1830 novel, Paul Clifford:

"It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents--except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness."

So, if you ever needed a justification for producing poor writing, there it is: Write crap. Write really badly. Or perhaps, write real badly. Or even - write real bad. Like, write anything that tumbleslumps into your headlights blaring. Any worm of an idea that metaphormulates itself in your mindovermatter. Be open wide-eyed enough to commit it to the page and coat tails of your zealous overwriting. Hush, I hear the thunder of a braying donkey hee-hawing into eternity, through the blank mud-in-your-eye blindness of the beast of dirkness, the monstrous of dorkiness, inherent and unheard of in the anals of our world view.

Give it a try. Who knows what might emerge?

12
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
Online Writing: Beginner Tips  |  10 Important Things That Every Triond Writer Should Do to Improve Your Earnings
More Articles by Barry Carozzi
Poets Cornered Three a New Poetic Form  |  Writing Can be Lonely Work
Latest Articles in How To
Ten Poetry Pitfalls  |  My Unfailing Desire
Comments (8)
#1 by Poppy, Jan 9, 2008
'Free writing' is the only way I write. Anything after that is editing. Although, I'm guessing this process wouldn't work as well with non-fiction writing.
#2 by Betty, Jan 9, 2008
There is some good advice in this article for any 'would-be' writers. But, I found it lengthy. I find reading text on the screen of my computer uncomfortable. So if the same message could be 'short and sweet' it might encourage more readers to read it all. It would work that way for me, and because I have spoken to other people about this 'hazard' I know there are others that agree with me about lengthy documents on the screen to read.
#3 by Gary, Jan 9, 2008
I believe the idea of students deliberately writing poorly is wonderful. Especially if your students are given the opportunity to share their bad writing and discuss the flaws they have included. The results of such a lesson are more likely to be remembered than those of a traditional lesson where a teacher is merely writing flawed examples on a black board.
#4 by Richard, Jan 10, 2008
Most of what I write has been feature articles for newspapers, mostly based on factual issues. These require research and structure. The only fictional short story I've had published was done Barry's way. I was required to write a short story for a class, and I had no idea what to write. I just sat down and started with a description of a man walking along the beach. Why? I didn't know. The whole story, and the twist at the end just 'came out.' For those who haven't tried it, give it a go!
#5 by Jac, Jan 10, 2008
I enjoy free writing. It has become a habit and if i were to think before i write then nothing would get done. My daily ritual is to write what ever i am thinking at the time while i am waiting for my 4yo to become bored of the slide or swings or whatever else is in the playground. Usually i give up before she does. I find that once i got into the habit it becomes part of your day.
#6 by Jo, Jan 11, 2008
Claps all round from me Barry.

The mention of free writing is something I am still trying to relax into. The ability to let go and make mistakes sounds easy, and yet - as I read this, my inner critic couldn't help but make her presence felt. She huffed and mumbled something rather crude under her breath then stalked off, back to her dwelling in the rear of my mind.
I guess things like this is where the expression - you can be your own worst enemy - comes from.




#7 by Andrew, Jan 16, 2008
A discussion well worth having. Personally, I've always been a little daunted by the Elbow/Cameron method of free writing, simply because of a spiteful inner voice that asks 'What if your subconscious doesn't measure up?' The idea of deliberately writing badly gives more licence, in a way. Which can't be a bad thing.
#8 by Glynis, Jul 21, 2008
How reassuring this article is, I always feel I write 'crap' ;)
I have gained a new method of thinking today, thanks
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Post comment with your Triond credentials?
Inside Writinghood

Literature

 /

Online Writing

 /

Style

 /

Writing

 /

Writing Business


Popular Tags
Popular Writers
Powered by
Writinghood
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.